Social networking is not innovation management.

There’s been much attention recently given to social networking and collaboration as it applies to the business process of innovation. It’s fueled by a growing crop of companies that are adopting a more open innovation model and inviting their communities of customers, partners and employees to participate in the process of sharing ideas, discussing them and voting on their favorites.

The potential benefits to a company can be huge:

  • Greater alignment with customers
  • Faster product development cycles
  • Reduced R&D costs

Dell’s Ideastorm and Starbuck’s “My Starbucks Idea” are two well-publicized examples of online customer communities designed to foster collaboration around new product ideas. Both of these brands have successfully grown web sites with hundreds of thousands of participants and ideas. So, when given the platform to speak up, people are more than willing to participate.

Sounds like a windfall, right? Build a community site and poof you’re the next great innovative company…not so fast…

Social networking alone isn’t innovation management. Ideation is an important step, but it is just the front-end of the innovation funnel. This growing trend of online idea sharing is exciting but it’s raising some questions into how to best apply the valuable (but unstructured) input from customer communities and social networks into the complex product development process:

  • Are the most popular ideas the most lucrative ones for the company to pursue?
  • If misapplied, can the wisdom of crowds actually lead an organization to the wrong decision?
  • Does the input from the community site replace traditional R&D?
  • How can internal product teams effectively connect the ideas and feedback from the community to the other downstream steps of the product planning and development process?

Here’s a recent article that highlights some of the challenges:
http://www.innovationtools.com/Articles/EnterpriseDetails.asp?a=332

Our opinion: Whereas the focus recently has been on the creation of customer communities, we believe the focus now will naturally shift to solving the bigger challenge of how to best manage this new channel of customer input and apply it to the internal process of developing new products. The companies that get this right will be the ones that realize the greatest financial benefits.

What’s your opinion? Post a comment and let us know your thoughts.

Jama Software named Finalist for OEN Awards.

The Oregon Entrepreneurs Network has selected Jama Software as one of four finalists for the 15th Annual 2008 OEN Tom Holce Awards for Entrepreneurship in the Development Category.

Finalists and award winners will be recognized during the event at the Oregon Convention Center on September 18, 2008. This year’s event theme “Rogues and Renegades” honors the independent spirit of Oregon’s entrepreneurs.

Even though our customers are worldwide, we take pride in our Portland roots and membership within OEN. We are honored to be participating in this year’s award ceremony and look forward to seeing everyone there.

For more information: Read the OEN Awards blog post

Requirements management makes the grade.

How in sync is the academic world with your industry? Is the next generation of project management and product development directors well versed with the tools of the trade?

As a vendor, we feel it’s important to do our part to support universities and educational institutions that are preparing students to be successful at the next level.

We recently experienced first-hand that in the case of requirements management, the students at St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia, are ahead of the class.

Graduate students at St. Joseph’s were paired up and assigned an interesting project for their Masters program. They had to understand the latest requirements management tools well enough to deliver a sales presentation and product demo to the rest of the class, and make a compelling case for why the solution they represented was superior. It required them to dig in beyond features and understand customer needs, product positioning, competitive differentiators, pricing and sales strategy.St. Joseph's Masters Class

Brian Brown and Mareme Gueye chose Contour, our Web-based requirements management tool.

They shared with us the materials they put together and we were very impressed with the high-quality work they did. Of course, it didn’t hurt that they wore the Jama “People against Project Failure” rockstar t-shirts for their final presentation.

“Brian & Mareme did a wonderful job on the final assignment I gave the class. I was impressed that Jama showed so much interest in their work. You are the only company that took a personal interest,” said Shelley Weismer, the professor who taught the class.

The future looks bright for the graduating class of 2008. Good luck!

Dropping Google ads for Kiva loans - will it work?

Where should we invest our marketing budget to create awareness and generate leads for our product in the most cost-effective way? It’s a question we deal with every day as a growing business.

Sponsored events, email lists, online ads, paid search - early on, we invested in these standard channels, following the same marketing playbook as most vendors. No surprise, the bulk of our spend was going to Google Adwords, as high as 80% of our monthly spend.

Over time though, the costs increased as companies in our space competed over the top spots. This is great for Google, but it was crushing our performance metrics. Despite ongoing optimization efforts, the average cost-per-click and cost-per-lead metrics grew to be 2-3x our target range. We were investing a lot of money and questioning the real value it delivered back to our business.

We decided to do the unthinkable - we went cold turkey and deactivated our Google Adwords campaign - turning it off completely. Can you really drop Google ads and survive as a business - is that even legal?

We can laugh, but there’s this sense of obligation that as a business, you have to throw money into Google’s deep coffers, like it’s an online tax. We’re not bucking the Google bandwagon to just be different, we’re doing it because it simply wasn’t delivering the ROI we need to achieve our goals.

So, we had an idea. We had been sponsoring Kiva.org for the past few months as an organization we really admire and believe in - they’re the online micro-lending site that helps entrepreneurs in the developing world. And, we wanted to figure out a way to funnel the dollars we were sending to Google ads over to Kiva loans.

We realize we can’t give away money unless we make money. So, the experiment is to see if we can raise enough awareness and trials through this indirect pr channel to replace the paid search ads on Google - If we can, we’ll make it a permanent switch.

In other words, we’d much rather help a chicken farmer in Cambodia feed her village than fund a Google billionaire’s hobby of flying to space.

Here’s how it works:

We call it the “You try. We give.” program. The more people that learn about Jama Software and do a free trial of Contour, the more new customers we sign on. The more our business grows, the more loans we’re able to give to Kiva entrepreneurs.

The program relies on the power of social networking on the Web via blogs, news articles, people passing it along to friends and colleagues in email and word of mouth. So, we’re hitting the phones, sending emails and leveraging our online community to help us see if social marketing can truly outperform search marketing. We believe it can and we need your help to prove it.

“We’re thrilled when a company like Jama Software develops an innovative program that supports both our global mission at Kiva and their own goals.  It’s such a simple  concept, but that’s the  beauty of it,” said Jessica Jackley Flannery, co-founder and chief marketing officer of Kiva.org

If you like the idea, have a need for our product, then do a free trial and pass this blog post along to your social network. Thanks!

Customer Needs – The tip of the iceberg.

Here at Jama we take a pretty open approach to the development of Contour, our collaborative requirements management / project management software and incorporate customer feedback, input from our advisors as well as research and planning we perform internally. We often invite smart people to have lunch with us to give us feedback on our vision for Contour and insight into what would be the perfect tool to help them. We trade sandwiches for market insights.

Yesterday, Lori Schmall, COO of Grist joined us. Grist is a Seattle based on-line media company focused on the environment. Time magazine recently named Grist the top green web site.

While we like to think and act green as a company – she was quick to point out a few plastic water bottles scattered around the conference room - I think we’ve got some work to do.  Lori’s past life was in senior management at a Fortune 500 technology firm dealing with scenarios that are near and dear to our heart – enterprise product development and project management.

We focused first on our sales presentation.  We’re constantly refining it to better speak to the value of our product, keep the flow engaging and eliminate the bullet points (we believe in a bullet point free world). This reminded me I need to revisit http://www.presentationzen.com/.

Our takeaways from this discussion:

  • Get the audience involved as quickly as possible. This helps keep everyone focused and involved in the presentation
  • Use stories to illustrate points, it’s much more interesting for everyone
  • A little humor never hurts, we all can relate to funny scenarios that we live through

We then turned to the pain of project management. Lori offered up a nice, simplified definition of requirements management: “Delivering what the customer wants”.  This speaks to the broader set of functionality that’s available within Contour.

For Lori, the #1 one pain point is when the team loses sight of what’s important to the customer.  On long, complex projects when things change, it’s easy to get disconnected from what the stakeholders are expecting.  She gave a great metaphor. It’s like an iceberg – the customer defines what they want, but it’s just the visible tip of the iceberg. The development team then has to create and manage through the supporting structure underneath the surface – the mammoth, complicated task of defining use cases, tasks, coding, testing, documenting, deploying to get to the end result of what the customer wants.

The key themes were:

  • Visibility into the project – understanding what the status is at all times and who’s doing what
  • Alignment – keeping everyone on the same page.

Continuing the metaphor, these strategy sessions with outside executives help us come up for air once and awhile, and keep us focused on the big picture of the value we deliver to customers.  Thanks Lori for your time.

Product Failure

I was searching around reading about top causes of product failure and found this blog post about product failure at Google.  Well… not actually a real product failure -but it made me laugh.  Have a read.

One interesting presentation I found was “Assuming doesn’t feed the Bulldog“. There are some good stats within the slides that validated some of our research and assumptions.

One stat I found interesting was a slide that shows where resources are wasted on failed products by stage. The #1 stage was during product development. To me that illustrates how critical it is to understand your customer needs as you start spending money on development- but also how important execution is. If you’ve nailed the solution to a major customer pain, but the product team isn’t aligned and misses the mark, it’s costly.

Traceability - Just Make it Simple.

You hear a lot about “traceability’ in context to requirements management. It’s one of the primary benefits and reasons for buying a requirements management solution.

As the products we’re all building become more sophisticated as stand-alone software applications or embedded software within physical products, it’s common for development projects to consist of hundreds or thousands of requirements and other related items.

So, how do you keep track of everything when changes occur? That’s where traceability comes in.

Traceability helps you create relationships between requirements, use cases, test cases, tasks and any other items within a project, and across multiple projects, so when changes occur, as they often do, you can easily

traceability_video_button1.jpg

  • Assess the impact
  • Keep the team aligned
  • And, keep the project on track

Our philosophy for building the traceability features within Contour is “make it powerful, but keep it simple.”

And, the reason for our obsession with simplicity is because setting up trace relationships involves some time upfront to reap the benefits later on in the project life-cycle. So, the big question often becomes, “Is traceability worth the effort?”

What we’ve tried to do differently is make this process as fast and simple as possible within Contour, so it’s no longer a question of whether “it’s worth it” to do traceability. To illustrate our approach, we put together this short video.

Is traceablity valuable to your team? Is it hassle? We’re curious what you think.

Making a Strong Case for Requirements Management

Is Requirements Management a smart investment right now? What’s the expected ROI for an RM tool? Does your executive team view RM as a “must have” or a “nice to have” solution?kevin_roi_analysis.JPG

I find myself having conversations on these topics with customers almost every day so I thought I’d write about the analysis we do to help answer those questions. These are great discussions and with any enterprise software purchase, it’s a good practice to assess the total cost of ownership and determine the anticipated return on investment (ROI). And, especially in a tough economy, this is even more critical.

The good news is that in the field of requirements management, there’s a pretty thorough model that exists. We use an ROI model developed for Software Quality Engineering (Stickyminds.com) by Richard Denney, a software and process management consultant. This model has been used by many in the industry to assess the value of requirements management.

It helps quantify the tangible cost savings and benefit-to-cost ratio for these 4 key benefits of RM:

  1. Improved team efficiency
  2. Avoiding lost requirements
  3. Avoiding unnecessary work
  4. Reducing requirements defects

On average, the cost savings we’re seeing for companies range from $300k – $400k per year for a team size of 20 though there are a handful of variables to consider to customize the analysis to your team.roi_analysis_snapshot.jpg

That being said, getting a good return assumes commitment and from the team and that the requirements tool isn’t shelfware.

We’ve seen that it’s easier to be successful when the development process matches team dynamics and the tools selected have team buy in.

If you are thinking about the value of requirements management or how to quantify a requirements management solution, let me know. I’ll share our version of the spreadsheet and ROI doc. Email me at kthomson@jamasoftware.com.

Meet the new members of the Jama community.

Jama’s “You try. We give.” program.  Meet the Kiva loan recipients.

- Tiv Socheat - mother of 2 and chicken farmer in Cambodia
- Elida Angelica Ruiz Cardenas - mother and fish retailer in Peru
- Eliseo Canales - pineapple and dragon fruit farmer in Nicaragua
- Rosemary Rushagara - mother of 4, caretaker of orphaned kids from HIV and store owner in Tanzania
- Nguyen Thi Ngat -daycare provider and educator in Vietnam

"You try. We give." program

and several others…

Who are they? They aren’t customers, employees or partners. They are the first of the Kiva.org loan recipients that we’ve sponsored through our “You try. We give.” program.

What started out as a small idea during a team meeting in February has blossomed into an ongoing program that reflects our corporate values and commitment to giving back on behalf of our customers, partners and other members of our community. For every customer that trials Contour, our collaborative requirements management software, we set aside marketing dollars to donate for loans that help Kiva.org recipients improve their own communities.

We chose Kiva.org because they embody a few fundamental principles that we share:

1. a belief that the entrepreneurial spirit lives in everyone
2. thousands of micro-actions that create a cumulative macro-effect
3. taking a collaborative, Web-based approach to solving a problem
4. an open, global community of people working together for greater success

View our lender page on Kiva: http://kiva.org/lender/jamasoftware

We’re still a young company with limited funds, so as we grow, this program will grow too. We look forward to introducing the new Kiva recipients each quarter. Thanks for showing your support by evaluating Contour and enabling us to help more companies succeed with requirements management.

Welcome Stratos Global!

We are extremely excited to welcome Stratos Global, the worldwide leader in truly global communications to the Contour family.

Stratos offers a full range of worldwide products and services from Inmarsat, Iridium and others; end-to-end microwave and VSAT solutions; as well as MarineSat/LandSat services to global organizations who need reliable voice, data and IP communications for mission-critical applications. Don’t know what that means? Either did I before I met the folks at Stratos. Think of it this way, whether you are surfing the web for updates on Hurricane Bertha from the 500 miles off the Florida Keys, or calling your family from the top of Everest, chances are you are using telecommunication products and services from Stratos Global.

With more than a century of service and over 20,000 customers, Stratos is doing things right. And we like partnering with customers that do things right.

Welcome Stratos Global!